Valor | Energy Connection – August 17, 2026

August 17, 2026 Edition

At Valor, our goal is to keep you informed of the latest news and updates from the oil and gas industry. We are committed to sharing the insights and knowledge that our team gathers to help you stay ahead in this dynamic sector. From mergers and acquisitions to regulatory changes and technological advancements, we cover all the key developments that impact the industry. Stay tuned for weekly updates to keep you well-informed.


  • Peregrine Energy Partners acquires producing position in Eddy County
  • Summary: Peregrine Energy Partners completed three acquisitions that added 3,680 net mineral and royalty acres across New Mexico, Colorado, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. The acquired assets include interests in over 1,240 producing wells, with the Eddy County acquisition comprising roughly 40 net mineral wells in New Mexico. The New Mexico position currently produces across all depths from 5 wells targeting Yeso intervals operated by Riley Exploration Permian, though financial terms were not disclosed.
  • Read more

    Oil prices fall as OPEC and IEA slash 2026 demand outlooks
  • Summary: Brent Crude fell 0.5% to $88.56 per barrel and WTI Crude dropped 0.60% to $82.77 after OPEC and the IEA slashed 2026 demand forecasts. The IEA expects global oil demand to slump by 1.6 million bpd this year, a 510,000 bpd decline from July estimates, while OPEC lowered its growth forecast to 580,000 bpd from 780,000 bpd. Prices were further pressured by a 17.4 million barrel build in U.S. crude inventories for the week ending August 7, bringing commercial stockpiles to 424.4 million barrels.
  • Read more
  • Permian Basin, Texas lead gains in drilling rig counts last week
  • Summary: Baker Hughes reported that the Permian Basin added 3 rigs to reach 263, while Texas added 2 rigs to reach 275, representing a 13.17 percent increase from 243 a year ago. The U.S. total held steady for a second straight week at 588 rigs, up 49 rigs or 9.09 percent year-over-year, supported by 3 additional oil-directed rigs. Regional counts remained unchanged in New Mexico at 96, Haynesville at 56, Eagle Ford at 49, Oklahoma at 50, and Louisiana at 38, while Marcellus fell by 1 rig to 24.
  • Read more
  • U.S. fuel prices will stay painfully high for a while
  • Summary: Gasoline currently sells for over $4 a gallon while diesel reaches around $5.40, up from $3.16 and $3.72 twelve months ago, respectively. The U.S. Department of Energy updated its forecasts on Tuesday, projecting third-quarter gasoline to average $4 a gallon before falling to $3.72 in the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, diesel prices are projected to remain high and fall just shy of $5 a gallon by the end of the year, keeping fuel costs elevated well into the fall.
  • Read more
  • U.S. natural gas output, demand to hit record highs in 2026, EIA says
  • Summary: The EIA projects U.S. dry gas production will rise from 107.6 bcfd in 2025 to 111.2 bcfd in 2026 and 116.0 bcfd in 2027, while domestic consumption increases to 92.0 bcfd in 2026 and 94.8 bcfd in 2027. Average LNG exports are forecast to grow from 15.1 bcfd in 2025 to 17.4 bcfd in 2026, helping lift October gas inventories to a decade high of around four trillion cubic feet. Meanwhile, coal production is expected to drop to 514.4 million tons in 2026, as fossil fuel carbon dioxide emissions fall to 4.818 billion metric tons.
  • Read more

    Oracle’s $165 billion data center plan hits a gas pipeline delay
  • Summary: Energy Transfer subsidiary Transwestern Pipeline pushed the in-service date for its Green Chile Project from August 15 to February 1, 2027, creating a six-month delay for Oracle’s Project Jupiter in New Mexico. The pipeline is designed to supply up to 400 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, which represents about 0.4% of total Lower 48 U.S. gas production, to power up to 2.5 gigawatts of Bloom Energy fuel cells. Following the filing, shares of Oracle dropped 4% while Energy Transfer gained 1.4%.
  • Read more

    Net Power says it is focusing on gas to ride data center demand
  • Summary: Net Power Inc. has indefinitely shelved its Oxy-Combustion Cycle emission-capturing technology to prioritize unabated natural gas generation for data center demand. The Houston-based company is pursuing a West Texas gas-fired generation project with an expected capacity of one gigawatt, having contracted two gas turbine generator sets with a nominal gross power of approximately 68 megawatts. Net Power reported $312.91 million in current assets and $17.58 million in current liabilities at the end of Q2.
  • Read more


Contact Valor Today

Contact us today if you need help outsourcing your oil and gas operations.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. The blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

When a Co-Owner of Your Minerals Passes Away


Valor has recovered more than $32 million for mineral owners, and a meaningful share of that work has involved families navigating mineral ownership after the loss of a loved one. During an already difficult time, it is understandable for title updates and operator paperwork to fall behind. Unfortunately, when that happens, royalty payments may be placed in suspense until ownership records are brought up to date.

If you own minerals with a spouse, sibling, parent, or business partner, the form of ownership on your deed determines what happens to the interest when one co-owner passes away. It also affects what the surviving owner or family may need to do before county records and royalty payments can be updated.

This post walks through the three ways minerals are commonly co-owned in Texas and Oklahoma, what generally happens under each form of ownership, and the documents that may need to be recorded to keep title records accurate and payments moving.

The three ways minerals are commonly co-owned

Before determining what happens after a co-owner’s death, the first step is understanding how the interest was held. In Texas and Oklahoma, mineral interests are typically co-owned in one of three ways, and each has different consequences for succession.

Tenancy in common is the default. If a deed conveys minerals to two or more people without survivorship language, they generally hold as tenants in common. Each owner has a distinct fractional share they can sell, lease, devise by will, or pass through intestate succession. When a tenant in common passes away, their share does not automatically transfer to the other co-owners. Instead, it generally passes to their heirs or devisees through probate or an heirship proceeding.

Joint tenancy with right of survivorship (JTWROS) works differently. Upon the death of one joint tenant, that owner’s interest passes automatically to the surviving joint tenant or tenants outside of probate. In Texas, JTWROS is not presumed — it must be created by a written agreement that specifically states survivorship intent under Texas Estates Code section 111.001. Oklahoma is similar: survivorship language must be explicit in the granting instrument. If the deed simply says “to John and Mary Smith,” that generally creates a tenancy in common rather than JTWROS.

Community property with right of survivorship is Texas-specific. Available to married couples, it combines community property tax treatment — including the potential for a double step-up in basis at the first spouse’s death — with automatic survivorship, and it must be created by a written survivorship agreement that meets statutory requirements. Oklahoma is not a community property state, so this form does not apply there.

Because small differences in deed language can have significant consequences, it is important to review the recorded instrument rather than assume how an interest will pass. If you have not confirmed what your deed says or need help locating it, Valor’s courthouse mineral research guide walks through how to find it by state.

What actually transfers at death under each form

Consider a husband and wife who each own an undivided one-half of the minerals under a 320-acre tract in Reeves County. If the husband passes away, what happens to his interest depends entirely on how the deed was written.

If they held the minerals as tenants in common, the wife continues to own her original one-half interest. The husband’s one-half becomes part of his estate. If he had a will, it generally passes according to the terms of that will. If he died intestate and the minerals were his separate property, Texas descent rules may result in the surviving spouse sharing ownership with children or other family members.

If they held the minerals as JTWROS or community property with right of survivorship, the surviving spouse generally becomes the owner of the deceased spouse’s interest automatically. Probate may not be required for that transfer. Even so, the operator does not automatically know that a death has occurred, and the county records will continue to show both owners until the appropriate documentation is recorded.

This is an easy step to overlook, especially while a family is managing everything that follows the loss of a loved one. A surviving owner may reasonably assume that survivorship language means there is nothing further to do. In practice, operators and county records generally still require documentation before ownership records and royalty payments can be updated.

Valor’s mineral management team regularly helps families work through these situations. Addressing the documentation as early as reasonably possible can make the process more straightforward and help reduce payment delays. For more context on how suspense works and how funds may be released, read Why Your Royalty Check Suddenly Stopped.

Documents you may need to record

The specific paperwork depends on the form of ownership and whether the estate goes through probate. Below is a practical overview of some of the most common scenarios.

For JTWROS or community property with survivorship in Texas: record a certified copy of the death certificate in the deed records of every county where the minerals are located, along with any required affidavit of survivorship identifying the specific deed that created the survivorship interest — including book and page or instrument number — the legal description of the minerals, and the surviving owner. The operator may also request copies of the recorded documents, a W-9 in the survivor’s name, and information needed to update the division order.

For tenancy in common with a will: probate may be required before the deceased owner’s interest can be transferred. Once the will is admitted to probate and the appropriate court documents are available, certified copies may need to be recorded in the county deed records. If the executor conveys minerals by executor’s deed, that document should also be recorded. Operators will generally require the relevant recorded documents and new W-9s for each beneficiary.

For tenancy in common where the decedent died intestate: in Texas, an affidavit of heirship may be used in some circumstances to establish family history and heirship. In Oklahoma, certain estates may qualify for procedures such as a summary determination of heirship under 58 O.S. section 393, while others may require formal probate. Once heirship is established, the appropriate documents should be recorded and provided to the operator along with new W-9s and updated contact information for each heir.

For a broader discussion of probate and heirship when minerals are located in another state, read Inherited Minerals in a State You Don’t Live In.

In every case: update the property tax rolls with the appropriate county appraisal district, notify every operator paying on every well — not just the largest one — and keep certified copies of important ownership documents in a place where family members or future representatives can find them. One common source of delays is updating ownership with one operator while unintentionally overlooking others.

Royalty suspense and what families can do

Every operator has a slightly different suspense policy, but the general process is similar. Once an operator receives notice that an owner has passed away, it may place royalty payments in suspense until it receives sufficient documentation establishing who is legally entitled to receive the funds.

The exact requirements vary, but operators commonly request proof of death, documentation showing who inherited the interest, and a new W-9 for each new payee. During that period, payments may continue to accrue even though they are not being distributed. Depending on the size of the interest and the length of the delay, the balance can become significant.

In Texas, certain unclaimed mineral proceeds may eventually be reported to the state under Property Code Chapter 74. If you believe royalties may already have been remitted as unclaimed property, search the relevant state’s unclaimed property database before contacting the operator.

To help minimize delays, families can often address the county-recording and operator-notification processes at the same time, once the necessary legal documents are available.

Advance planning can also make these transitions easier for loved ones. If you want automatic survivorship with a spouse, an attorney can help determine whether a written survivorship agreement that complies with Texas Estates Code section 111.001 or the applicable Oklahoma requirements is appropriate. If you want your share to pass to specific children or other beneficiaries, a transfer-on-death deed may be an option in some circumstances. Texas allows TOD deeds for real property, including minerals, under Estates Code Chapter 114.

For owners with meaningful interests, a revocable living trust may also help avoid probate and provide greater continuity through generational transitions.

None of this is legal advice — mineral ownership, probate, and succession laws vary by state and by individual circumstances, so owners and families should work with an oil and gas or estate-planning attorney licensed in the relevant state.

The broader takeaway is simple: thoughtful planning during an owner’s lifetime can reduce uncertainty and administrative burden for loved ones later.


Contact Valor Today

Managing mineral interests after the loss of a family member can add an unfamiliar administrative burden at a time when families already have a great deal to handle.

If you are unsure what documents need to be recorded, whether royalties have been placed in suspense, or whether operator and county records reflect the correct ownership, contact Valor for a free, no-obligation review. Our mineral management team can help you understand what your specific situation may require, identify suspended royalties, and work through the ownership updates needed by operators and county records.

Valor works with owners and families managing inherited mineral rights and co-ownership title matters across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.

Valor | Energy Connection – August 10, 2026

August 10, 2026 Edition

At Valor, our goal is to keep you informed of the latest news and updates from the oil and gas industry. We are committed to sharing the insights and knowledge that our team gathers to help you stay ahead in this dynamic sector. From mergers and acquisitions to regulatory changes and technological advancements, we cover all the key developments that impact the industry. Stay tuned for weekly updates to keep you well-informed.


  • Diamondback reports first production of one million barrels of oil equivalent
  • Summary: Midland-based Diamondback Energy reported Q2 production of 1.018 million boed, the first time the company has reached at least one million boed. Oil production rose to 525,000 b/d while CEO Kaes Van’t Hof confirmed the company is holding capital spending at $3.9 billion this year, relying on technical innovation to improve recovery across nearly 9,000 locations on 902,000 Permian Basin acres.
  • Read more

    San Mateo Midstream closes $752M acquisition of Cardinal Midstream
  • Summary: San Mateo Midstream, a joint venture between Matador Resources and Five Point Infrastructure, completed its $752 million acquisition of Cardinal Midstream in the northern Delaware Basin. The deal adds a gas processing plant in Loving County, Texas with roughly 320 MMcf/d of inlet capacity and approximately 145 miles of gathering pipelines, bringing San Mateo’s total processing capacity above one billion cubic feet per day. The acquisition makes San Mateo the largest private natural gas processor in the area and adds nine new gas customers to the system.
  • Read more
  • U.S. energy firms leave rig count unchanged in latest week, Baker Hughes says
  • Summary: U.S. energy firms left the total rig count unchanged this week as oil rigs fell by three to 409 while gas rigs rose by three to 133, their highest level since July 2023. The count remains 45 rigs or 8.3% above last year, and the EIA projects 2026 crude output will reach 13.7 million bpd with gas output hitting 111.0 bcfd. Despite the pause, the sustained year-over-year growth reflects continued operator confidence in current price levels.
  • Read more
  • Natural gas producers head into winter promising restraint
  • Summary: Natural gas producers are heading into winter 2026/27 deferring wells and tying drilling plans to stronger prices, even as new Permian Basin pipelines open the market’s next wave of supply. The Hugh Brinson Pipeline is expected to reach its full 1.5 Bcf/d capacity by September 1, directing more Permian gas to Henry Hub as the summer cooling season winds down. Storage inventories remain 6.7% above the five-year average following a larger-than-expected 33 Bcf build for the week ending July 31.
  • Read more
  • Oil price uncertainty as negotiations continue
  • Summary: WTI crude futures were trading near $84.12 late in the week, down approximately 7%, as conflicting signals from ongoing Hormuz negotiations created uncertainty about the near-term supply outlook. Vessel traffic through the Strait declined from the prior week as Iran weighed terms for a potential permanent shipping arrangement. Analysts noted that limited spare capacity and low commercial inventories leave prices exposed to significant volatility in either direction.
  • Read more

    U.S. upstream M&A declines in Q2, but Permian demand remains robust
  • Summary: U.S. upstream M&A fell to $9.1 billion in Q2, down 76% from Q1 and the third-lowest quarterly total since 2020, as crude price volatility complicated deal valuations. Despite slower deal flow, Enverus reports that pricing for top-tier Permian acreage keeps climbing as high-quality drilling locations become scarce. The firm expects activity to accelerate in H2 2026 as higher oil prices improve free cash flow for buyers and encourage private operators to bring assets to market.
  • Read more

    How Chevron became the AI darling of Big Oil
  • Summary: Chevron signed a 20-year agreement with Microsoft to supply 2.67 gigawatts of natural gas-fired power for data centers in Reeves County, Texas, in a project dubbed Project Kilby slated to come online in 2028. CEO Mike Wirth confirmed the Permian Basin can grow production to support additional hyperscaler agreements, positioning Chevron as the leading energy company in AI data center power. SpaceX and Amazon are also building private gas power plants in Texas, with Amazon’s proposed GW Ranch project potentially generating 7.65 gigawatts from 35 turbines.
  • Read more


Contact Valor Today

Contact us today if you need help outsourcing your oil and gas operations.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. The blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Inherited Mineral Rights in Another State: Probate, Trusts, and What to Do Next

If you just inherited mineral rights in Texas, Oklahoma, or any other state where a family member owned acreage, the first thing to understand is jurisdictional. Title to mineral interests is generally governed by the law of the state where the minerals are located, even when the owner lived and completed probate elsewhere. That distinction drives everything that happens next — which court handles what, what additional proceedings you may need to open, and whether the trust your parent set up in Florida or California can actually take title to a Reeves County royalty interest.

Valor has recovered more than $28 million for mineral owners in the past 36 months and manages interests across 32 states and 13 major basins. The pattern is consistent: heirs and executors lose months, sometimes years, because no one explained the rules at the start.

Why the mineral state’s law governs title

Real property — and mineral interests are real property in Texas, Oklahoma, and most producing states — is governed by the law of the state where the property is located. A Florida probate alone may not be sufficient to establish record title to a Texas mineral interest. Texas law governs how the interest transfers, who has authority to sign leases and division orders, and what documents the county clerk will accept for recording.

A title examiner reviewing the ownership chain for an operator will generally require documentation that establishes the transfer under the law of the mineral state. Without that, the interest sits in title limbo and operators may place royalties in suspense pending satisfactory title documentation.

The practical effect for heirs: you may need to coordinate title transfer work in multiple states before a single royalty check is released. Understanding the required proceedings early can reduce delays that otherwise extend the administration significantly. If you are just starting this process, read Just Inherited Mineral Rights? Here Is Where to Start for the foundational steps before working through the jurisdictional issues covered here.

Domiciliary probate vs. ancillary proceedings: understanding the options

Domiciliary probate is the primary proceeding, opened in the county where the decedent was legally domiciled at death. That court has authority over personal property, bank accounts, and — critically — appoints the executor who will act for the estate.

When minerals are located outside the decedent’s home state, an ancillary probate or another state-authorized title transfer procedure may be required in each mineral state. The purpose is to give the mineral state jurisdiction to recognize the will or apply intestate succession, confirm the executor’s authority in that state, and issue orders the county clerk will record.

Ancillary probate is common, but it is not always the only path. Depending on the state and circumstances, alternatives may include recording authenticated foreign probate documents, a muniment of title procedure, an affidavit of heirship, summary proceedings, or small estate procedures. In Texas, venue and the appropriate probate court depend on the county, the type of proceeding, and the local court structure. In Oklahoma, proceedings run through the district court of the county of situs.

When minerals sit in multiple states, potentially multiple proceedings or other state-specific transfer processes may be required — one for each state where the minerals are located. The mineral state may require authenticated documents from the domiciliary proceeding before it will recognize the will or authorize a local transfer. Because procedures and local filing requirements differ by state, consider retaining counsel licensed in each relevant jurisdiction. For a practical guide to the county records and courthouse research steps that support this process, read Valor’s courthouse mineral research guide.

Do you need a second trust for out-of-state minerals? Usually no.

This is one of the most common questions our mineral management team fields: the decedent set up a revocable living trust in their home state, and the family assumes they need a separate trust in Texas or Oklahoma to hold the minerals. In many ordinary estate-planning situations, a separate trust is not required.

A properly drafted revocable trust can hold real property, including mineral interests, in multiple states. What matters is not where the trust was created but what powers the trust instrument gives the trustee and what state law provides. A Texas trust holding Oklahoma minerals does not need a separate Oklahoma trust. A Montana decedent with North Dakota minerals does not need a North Dakota trust if the Montana trust instrument is properly drafted and the minerals are correctly titled into it.

If the minerals were properly conveyed to the trust during the grantor’s lifetime, the trustee may be able to administer them without probate. If they remained in the grantor’s individual name, a pour-over will may direct them to the trust, but probate or another state-authorized transfer process may still be required before the trustee can act on them.

Where families most commonly run into problems is when the trust exists on paper but the minerals were never actually transferred into it. A trust with a schedule of assets listing “Texas minerals” is not the same as a recorded mineral deed conveying those interests to the trustee. If the deed was never executed and recorded in the mineral county, the minerals remain in the decedent’s individual name and require a title transfer procedure to get them properly into the trust.

The rare case where a second trust makes sense is when there is a specific state-law objective — creditor protection under a particular state’s asset protection statute, or a directed trust arrangement — that the home-state trust cannot accomplish. For ordinary succession planning, one trust with clean deeds into it is cleaner and cheaper. For guidance on how mineral interests fit within a trust structure, read Minerals in a Trust: What Bankers, Trustees, and Mineral Owners Need to Know.

Trustee powers: confirm authority before acting

Even a well-drafted single trust can create friction if questions arise about the trustee’s authority to act on producing minerals. Producing minerals are not passive assets. A trustee holding a Reagan County royalty interest will be asked to sign division orders, ratifications, pooling amendments, and sometimes new leases when acreage comes off production.

The trust instrument and applicable state law should give the trustee sufficient authority to lease, pool, convey, ratify agreements, and execute division orders. Texas, for example, grants trustees broad statutory mineral-management powers, subject to the terms and limitations of the trust instrument. Clear express language in the trust can reduce uncertainty and minimize title objections regardless of what state law provides.

If questions arise about trustee authority, operators may place royalties in suspense pending satisfactory documentation. Resolving that may require a court order, a trust amendment, or a certification of trust depending on the circumstances and applicable state law. For context on what a division order requires and why unsigned or disputed ones can cause suspense, read Division Order, Lease Offer, or Buyout? How to Read the Letter About Your Mineral Rights.

Language to consider including during drafting: express power to execute oil, gas, and mineral leases on terms the trustee deems reasonable; power to pool, unitize, and ratify existing units; power to execute division orders, transfer orders, and stipulations of interest; and power to convey or sell mineral and royalty interests. Review the trust instrument and applicable state law with qualified counsel before acting.

This question comes up in almost every multi-state estate. An executor inheriting a small royalty in another state faces a real cost-benefit problem: transfer proceedings and legal fees may exceed the value of the interest.

The options are not simply abandon it or spend the money. Selling is possible if a mineral buyer will make an offer — small fractional interests are harder to market but not impossible. Deeding to the surface owner is another path if the surface and mineral ownership can be reunited cleanly. Donating the interest to a qualified charitable organization may be an option, although acceptance, valuation, appraisal requirements, and tax deduction rules should be reviewed with the organization and the owner’s tax adviser before proceeding.

Do not simply abandon a mineral interest without understanding the consequences. Depending on the state and how the interest is assessed, delinquent taxes associated with mineral property can create liens or lead to adverse consequences. Confirm the applicable tax treatment with qualified counsel before deciding to retain, transfer, or disclaim an interest. If you need help evaluating options for a small interest, Valor’s mineral management team can help you assess the production history, identify whether the interest has recoverable value, and find any unclaimed funds before any decision is made. The unclaimed mineral funds guide is a useful starting point.

A practical checklist for heirs and executors

If you are the executor or an heir on an estate with minerals outside the decedent’s home state, work through these steps in order. Getting them right up front compresses timelines and reduces the chance you discover a problem years in.

Identify every state where minerals exist. Check tax returns, operator tax forms, division order files, royalty statements, county records, and applicable state or local property tax records. Do not assume the estate inventory is complete.

Open domiciliary probate first. Get the will admitted and the executor qualified in the home state. Order multiple certified and authenticated copies — you will need them for any ancillary or foreign probate recognition proceedings.

Determine what title transfer procedure is required in each mineral state. Ancillary probate is common but not always the only path. Retain counsel licensed in each relevant jurisdiction to identify the appropriate procedure.

Check for an existing trust and confirm the minerals are actually in it. A schedule of assets listing minerals is not a recorded conveyance. If the deed was never executed and recorded in the mineral county, the minerals still require a title transfer procedure.

Review trustee powers and applicable state law before acting. Confirm the trust instrument and state law give the trustee sufficient authority to lease, pool, and execute division orders before responding to any operator request.

Notify operators in writing. Once the appropriate title documents are recorded, send certified copies to every operator with a transfer order request. Operators generally release suspended funds after their title requirements have been satisfied, subject to applicable law and any remaining ownership disputes. If royalties may already have been reported or remitted to the state as unclaimed property, search the relevant state’s unclaimed property database for each state before reaching out to operators.


Contact Valor Today

Inherited minerals in an unfamiliar state do not have to become a multi-year administrative problem. Contact Valor today for a free, no-obligation review — our mineral management team will help you organize the estate’s mineral position, identify every interest and its current pay status, coordinate with local counsel on ancillary proceedings, and work to get suspended royalties released as quickly as the paperwork allows. We handle inherited mineral rights and estate transfers for owners across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.

How to Calculate Your Royalty Decimal Interest

You opened the division order, saw a decimal like 0.00564234, and could not figure out where the number came from. You are not alone. This is one of the most common questions mineral owners ask after a horizontal well is completed, and the answer almost never appears on the paperwork itself.

Valor has recovered more than $28 million for mineral owners in the past 36 months, and a meaningful share of those recoveries started with an owner who did the decimal math themselves and found an error. This post walks through the exact formula, a fully worked horizontal well example, and how to find the missing inputs when your paperwork does not spell them out.

The formula for a standard leased mineral interest

For most standard pooled or spaced units, a mineral owner’s royalty decimal is built from the same three inputs: your net mineral acres in the tract, the size of the drilling or spacing unit the well is producing from, and your royalty rate under the lease.

The formula is:

Net Mineral Acres ÷ Drilling Unit Acres × Royalty Rate = Decimal Interest

If you want to run the numbers quickly before working through the steps below, Valor’s royalty decimal calculator does this math precisely and estimates your monthly share from any decimal.

For a conventional acreage-based pooled unit, the basic calculation does not change merely because the well is horizontal. Production-sharing wells, allocation wells, and units governed by special allocation provisions may require a different calculation — but for many owners receiving a standard division order on a conventional horizontal or vertical well, this is the basic formula.

If the number on your division order does not reconcile to those three inputs, one of the inputs on the operator’s side does not match what you believe to be true. Finding which one is the entire exercise.

For context on where decimal interests fit into ownership, leasing, and payment tracking, our mineral management overview covers the full lifecycle Valor manages for owners across 32 states and 13 basins.

A fully worked horizontal well example

Assume you inherited 14.4444 net mineral acres in a section in Martin County, Texas. The operator drills a horizontal Wolfcamp well and pools your tract into a standard 640-acre drilling unit. Your lease reserves a 25% royalty. The math looks like this:

14.4444 ÷ 640 × 0.25 = 0.00564234

Walking through it: 14.4444 divided by 640 equals 0.02256938 — your fractional mineral ownership in the unit. Multiply by the 0.25 royalty rate reserved in your lease and you get 0.00564234, the figure you would generally expect to see on the division order and associated check details, subject to any later ownership or unit adjustments.

To sanity-check, multiply the decimal by the well’s gross monthly revenue. If the well produces $500,000 in gross revenue in a given month, your gross royalty before taxes and post-production deductions is $500,000 × 0.00564234 = $2,821.17. That amount should approximate your gross royalty attributable to the well before applicable taxes, adjustments, and any deductions permitted under your lease. Check stub presentation varies by operator.

Operators commonly report decimal interests to six or eight decimal places. Even small rounding differences can affect payments over the productive life of a well.

Why a horizontal well decimal looks so much smaller

Owners who received royalties from an older vertical well on the same tract are often surprised at how much smaller the horizontal decimal is. The formula did not change — the denominator did.

A vertical well on a 40-acre or 80-acre proration unit gave you a much larger fraction of that smaller unit. Using the same 14.4444 net mineral acres and 25% royalty on an 80-acre vertical unit, the decimal would be 14.4444 ÷ 80 × 0.25 = 0.04513875 — roughly eight times larger than the horizontal decimal.

That does not mean you are worse off. Horizontal wells often produce substantially more than older vertical wells, so a smaller decimal does not by itself mean you will receive less revenue. The check stub optics can be jarring the first month, and it is why many owners call in convinced there is an error when there is not.

The corollary: if two horizontal wells are drilled in the same section and one is a 640-acre unit and the other is a 1,280-acre two-section unit, your decimal in the 1,280-acre unit will be exactly half — assuming the same acreage is committed, the same royalty rate applies, and production is allocated strictly by acreage.

Finding the spacing-unit size when the paperwork does not say

Division orders in Texas and Oklahoma routinely omit the drilling-unit acreage. They show the decimal, the well name, and sometimes the lease — but not the denominator you need to verify the math. Here is where to find it:

Texas wells. Texas wells. Search the RRC well records for the W-1 drilling permit, W-2 or G-1 completion packet, Form P-16 acreage designation, and any associated certified plat or acreage documentation. For a pooled unit, also review the recorded unit designation or pooling declaration in the county clerk’s records where the tract sits. For a broader guide to using RRC and county records to locate your interests, read Just Inherited Mineral Rights? Here Is Where to Start.

Oklahoma wells. The Oklahoma Corporation Commission spacing order sets the unit. Search by section-township-range or by the OCC cause number, which may appear on the division order or related well documents. Force-pooled owners will also find their election terms in the pooling order. For a plain-language explanation of how force pooling works and what it means for your decimal, read Forced Pooling in Oklahoma vs. Texas.

Both states. Request the unit designation, plat, and supporting ownership calculation from the operator. If the operator will not explain the calculation or provide supporting information, consider escalating the request or consulting a qualified land or legal professional.

Once you have the unit size, plug it into the formula. If the decimal still does not reconcile, the next issue to investigate is often the net mineral acreage, including possible title issues, unrecorded conveyances, or miscalculations of inherited fractional interests.

When your math and the division order do not agree

Three common reasons a calculated decimal does not match the one on the division order:

Your net mineral acre count is wrong. Inherited interests get fractionalized across generations. If a great-grandparent owned 160 acres and it was split five ways, then three ways in the next generation, your actual NMA may differ from the round number in family records. Confirming the interest generally requires reviewing the relevant county records and chain of title, often through a professional title examination. If you recently inherited and have not yet verified what you own, read Just Inherited Mineral Rights? Here Is Where to Start before you respond to any division order.

The unit is larger than you thought. Multi-section horizontal units are standard now. If you assumed 640 acres and the plat shows a 1,280-acre unit, your decimal will be exactly half of what you calculated. This is not an error — it is a paperwork gap.

The royalty rate on the operator’s file does not match your lease. If your lease reserves 25% but the operator’s records show 20%, your decimal will be 20% too low, and every check for the life of the well will be short. In Valor’s experience this is one of the most common and recoverable error categories we find across the portfolio. For a full breakdown of what royalty rate language in your lease actually controls, read Why Is My Royalty Check So Small? Post-Production Deductions, Explained.

Do not sign without first investigating a material discrepancy. Ask the operator to explain the calculation and provide supporting documents. Because division-order laws and the consequences of refusing to sign vary by state, consult a qualified attorney when a discrepancy cannot be resolved. If you have not received a division order and believe you should have, here is what to do.

This kind of decimal verification is a routine part of what Valor’s team of CPAs, CPLs, and Certified Mineral Managers does across the portfolio we manage — roughly 500,000 wells generating approximately $650 million in annual client revenue.


Contact Valor Today

If you are staring at a division order or a first check stub and the numbers do not add up, the explanation is often found in the unit documents, title records, lease, or operator ownership calculation. Contact Valor today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the discrepancy and determine whether a more detailed division order review is appropriate. Our royalty management team handles division order verification and royalty audits for owners across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Valor | Energy Connection – August 3, 2026

August 3, 2026 Edition

At Valor, our goal is to keep you informed of the latest news and updates from the oil and gas industry. We are committed to sharing the insights and knowledge that our team gathers to help you stay ahead in this dynamic sector. From mergers and acquisitions to regulatory changes and technological advancements, we cover all the key developments that impact the industry. Stay tuned for weekly updates to keep you well-informed.


  • $2.2 billion merger creates major Permian land and minerals platform
  • Summary: SoftVest and Blackbeard signed an agreement to combine Permian Basin Royalty Trust with Blackbeard’s assets to create PBT Land and Minerals in a $2.24 billion deal. Existing PBT unitholders will own 59% of the new entity, while Blackbeard holds 41% after contributing 80,000 net royalty acres and 68,000 surface acres. Blackbeard Operating has increased Waddell Ranch production from 3,000 bpd to over 35,000 bpd, and the new company will assume a $500 million credit facility with leverage below 0.4x EBITDA.
  • Read more

    U.S. natural gas prices fall 4% to 11-week low on record output
  • Summary: U.S. gas futures fell 3.6% to settle at $2.767 per mmBtu, marking an 11-week low driven by record daily output of 112.3 bcfd and ample storage. Average Lower 48 output rose to 110.6 bcfd in July, while storage levels sat 6.6% above normal for the week ending July 24. Meanwhile, average gas flows to major U.S. LNG export plants eased to 17.2 bcfd in July due to plant maintenance, contrasting with higher international prices of $20 per mmBtu in Europe and $22 in Asia.
  • Read more
  • Oil prices settle more than 1% higher, log strongest month since March
  • Summary: Oil prices closed higher on Friday as Brent rose 1.2% to $90.12 a barrel and WTI gained 1.3% to $84.67, bringing July gains to 24% and 21%, respectively. Market data showed 29 commodity vessels transited the Bab el-Mandeb strait on Thursday, while U.S. crude output dropped 2% in May from April’s record high. Concurrently, U.S. demand for crude and petroleum products fell over 3.5% in May to 20.07 million barrels per day, as analysts projected Brent crude to average $85.22 per barrel in 2026.
  • Read more
  • Counts decline last week of drilling rigs in Texas, Permian Basin, U.S.
  • Summary: Baker Hughes reported that U.S. drilling rigs dropped by 1 to 587, which remains up 45 rigs or 8.30 percent from 542 a year ago. Texas experienced its first decline after 14 weeks, dropping 2 rigs to 272, though its count remains up 23 rigs or 9.24 percent year-over-year. The Permian Basin count fell by 1 rig to 258, New Mexico held steady at 96, and Haynesville retained second place among basins with 56 rigs, while Eagle Ford held at 47, Oklahoma at 50, Louisiana at 37, and North Dakota at 24.
  • Read more
  • Strategic petroleum reserve now below half capacity of crude oil
  • Summary: The Bipartisan Policy Center reported that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve held 308 million barrels of crude oil as of July 24, which is less than half its 714 million barrel capacity and the lowest since 1983. Inventory fell following a 180 million barrel release in 2022 during the Russia-Ukraine war and a 172 million barrel release in 2026 after the Strait of Hormuz closed. Although below the 726 million barrel peak of 2009, the SPR volumes helped bridge gaps alongside reduced customer demand.
  • Read more

    Exxonmobil, Chevron steer windfall profits into debt reduction
  • Summary: ExxonMobil and Chevron directed Q2 blowout profits toward debt reduction rather than major buyback increases, with ExxonMobil lowering net debt by over $7 billion. Chevron allocated $8.4 billion to debt reduction and lifted output 20% to 4.07 million barrels per day, while Shell reduced net debt by $10.8 billion to lower its net debt-to-equity ratio under 19%. ExxonMobil posted $14.7 billion in overall profit, while Chevron achieved record quarterly profits supported by U.S. refinery utilization above 97%.
  • Read more

    OPEC+ is about to pause oil output hikes
  • Summary: OPEC+ plans to pause phased output increases after September, following a final target increase of about 188,000 barrels per day. The move concludes the rollback of a 1.65 million barrels per day supply cut agreed upon in 2023, even as Iraq’s output fell from 4 million to 1.4 million barrels per day. With Goldman Sachs warning oil could reach $120 per barrel, companies like Chevron and ConocoPhillips hold significant stakes in Iraqi fields, including West Qurna 2 and Kirkuk assets.
  • Read more


Contact Valor Today

Contact us today if you need help outsourcing your oil and gas operations.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. The blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Before You Throw That Letter Away: How to Verify Any Mineral Rights Notice

A letter arrived about your mineral rights. The return address is a company you have never heard of. It references a well you cannot place. It is asking for your tax ID or your signature.

Before you throw it away — read this first.

Last week on one of the most active mineral rights forums online, an owner asked whether a suspense notice from Plains Marketing was a scam. The top reply said “100000000% SCAM, throw that in the trash.” That answer was completely wrong. A landman in the same thread corrected it: he had a client who received the exact same kind of letter with $800,000 sitting in suspense behind it.

That scenario plays out constantly. In the past 36 months, Valor has recovered more than $28 million for mineral owners — and a surprising share of that money started with a letter the owner nearly threw away. This post walks through why most of these letters are legitimate, gives you a four-step routine to verify any letter in about 30 minutes, and identifies the narrow set of red flags that actually indicate a real scam.

Why mineral rights letters look like scams even when they are not

Valor manages more than 500,000 wells across 32 states and 13 basins. Across that footprint, the same categories of mail show up in owners’ mailboxes every week — and they almost always look worse than they are.

Three types account for the majority of concern:

Suspense notices. An operator is holding your royalty payments because something in the title chain, address, tax ID, or division order cannot be reconciled. The letter is a request for information, not a threat. Until you respond, your money sits in an account earning you nothing. If you believe funds may already be sitting in suspense, here is how to find unclaimed mineral funds.

W-9 requests from operators you do not recognize. Wells change hands constantly. The operator who drilled your section in 2014 may have sold the wellbore to a successor in 2022, who sold it again in 2025. Each time the operating interest transfers, the new payor is legally required to collect a fresh W-9 before cutting you a check. The company name on the letter will almost never match the name you have been dealing with. That is normal, not suspicious. For a plain-language explanation of what happens to your royalty payments when an operator sells, read What Happens to Your Royalty Payments When Your Operator Sells.

Unclaimed property notices from state treasurers. Every state escheats unclaimed royalty proceeds after a statutory dormancy period — typically three to five years. Treasurers then send notices to the last known address. These letters can look like phishing because they arrive out of nowhere and reference money the owner did not know existed. They are real.

None of these are scams. They are the mechanical output of a system that moves ownership, payments, and tax reporting across dozens of counterparties. The instinct to shred them is exactly what costs owners money. For the broader context on how these workflows fit together, our mineral management overview lays out the moving parts.

How to verify any mineral rights letter in 30 minutes

This routine works for almost any letter you will receive. You do not need a lawyer for steps one through four — only for the rare cases that fail all four.

Step 1: Identify the sender against public records. If the letter is from an operator, look up the company name on the Texas Railroad Commission’s operator query for Texas wells or the Oklahoma Corporation Commission’s website for Oklahoma. Legitimate operators have a P5 number in Texas or an OCC operator ID in Oklahoma. If the entity shows up in the state’s regulatory system with an active status, that is a strong first signal. If you cannot find them at all, that is worth noting before you respond.

Step 2: Match the property described in the letter to your records. The letter should reference a specific lease name, well name, API number, or legal description — section, township, and range, or abstract and survey. Pull your last division order or a prior check detail statement. If the property matches something you already own, the letter is almost certainly connected to a real interest. If you have never confirmed what you own at the county level, Valor’s courthouse mineral research guide walks through how to do that by state.

Step 3: Call the sender using a number you found independently. Do not call the number printed on the letter. Look up the operator’s main line through the state regulator’s records or their corporate website. Ask for owner relations, reference the letter, and confirm it originated with them. If the number on the letter and the number you found independently do not match, call the one you found yourself.

Step 4: Cross-check state treasurer notices at the source. Every state runs a free unclaimed property search — Texas at ClaimItTexas.gov, Oklahoma at the state treasurer’s site. If the notice references funds held by the state, that same claim should be searchable on the official portal using your name. If it shows up there, the letter is real.

The actual red flags that indicate a real scam

Real scams targeting mineral owners exist, but they do not look like suspense notices or W-9 requests. They look like unsolicited purchase offers and pressure tactics. Watch for these specific patterns:

Pressure to sign within days. Legitimate operators, state treasurers, and title companies operate on months-long timelines. Anyone insisting you must sign within 48 or 72 hours is manufacturing urgency to short-circuit your verification.

Requests for money upfront. No legitimate suspense release, W-9 processing, or unclaimed property claim requires you to pay a fee or wire funds. State treasurers return unclaimed property for free. Operators do not charge you to receive your own royalties.

Offers to buy your minerals sight-unseen at a flat per-acre number. A legitimate offer will let you take weeks to evaluate. A predatory one arrives with a check already enclosed and a deed pre-drafted, betting on your confusion. Before responding to any purchase offer, read Got an Offer to Buy Your Mineral Rights? How to Tell If It’s Actually Fair.

Payment instructions that route around normal channels. If a purported operator asks you to update banking information via a link in an email or send tax documents to a personal Gmail address, stop.

Vague property descriptions. A legitimate letter names the lease, well, or legal description. A scam letter tends to reference “your mineral interests” generically because the sender does not actually know what you own.

The through-line is simple: legitimate mail asks you to provide information. Fraudulent mail asks you to surrender something — money, signatures, or account access — before you have had time to think.

What ignoring a real letter actually costs you

The cost of throwing away a legitimate letter is not zero, and it compounds quietly.

A suspense notice ignored for 36 months means royalties sitting in the operator’s account instead of yours, and eventually escheating to the state. A W-9 request ignored means the operator withholds 24% backup withholding on every check going forward — money you have to chase back through your tax return. An unclaimed property notice ignored means the funds get harder to claim as time passes, because the documentation trail supporting your ownership gets colder.

Our mineral management team spends a real share of its time reversing the consequences of letters owners wish they had opened sooner. It is almost always cheaper and faster to respond to a legitimate letter in the first 30 days than to unwind the fallout years later. Valor is SOC 1 Type II certified, which means our controls around client data and communications are independently audited every year — the standard you should expect from anyone you hand a sensitive letter to.

If you are not sure which type of letter you received — division order, lease offer, or purchase offer — read Division Order, Lease Offer, or Buyout? How to Read the Letter About Your Mineral Rights before you respond to anything.


Contact Valor Today

If a letter arrived and still feels wrong after you have walked the four-step routine — or if you would rather not walk it alone — Contact Valor today for a free, no-obligation review. Our mineral management team will verify the sender, match the property to your ownership records, and tell you exactly what the letter is and what to do next before you sign, send, or shred anything. We handle letter verification, suspense releases, and unclaimed mineral fund recovery for owners across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

You Just Got an Offer for Your Minerals. Here’s What the Buyer Already Knows.

Mineral buyers do not send letters at random. Before an offer reaches your mailbox, an acquisitions team has already pulled your production history from public state filings, mapped every permit within a mile of your tract, modeled the decline curve on your producing wells, and calculated the return they need to justify the purchase. The offer is not a guess. It is a discount to a number they already trust. This post walks through what the buyer knows, how they built that number, and what you need in front of you before you respond.

The Buyer Has Already Pulled Your Production History

Before a single letter goes out, an acquisitions team pulls every public data point tied to your tract. In Texas, that means Railroad Commission filings — production reports, W-2 completions, plugging records, permit history. In Oklahoma, it is Corporation Commission filings and OTC gross production tax data. This is not proprietary information. It is public. But it takes time and tooling to assemble it into a usable picture, and most mineral owners have never done that work on their own tract.

The buyer knows your monthly BBL and MCF for every producing well tied to your interest, going back years. They know whether production is climbing, flat, or in decline. They know which operator is on the lease, how that operator performs across their portfolio, and how quickly that operator typically brings new wells online. If your interest sits in a stacked-pay county — Reagan, Martin, Reeves, Karnes, Grady, Canadian — they have modeled how many additional benches the operator is likely to develop and on what timeline.

You are negotiating against someone who has done homework you have not done. That is not a moral failing. It is the structural reality of the transaction, and it is the first thing to correct before you respond to any offer. Valor’s mineral management practice runs this same assembly on behalf of owners across 13 major basins, so the information gap closes before an offer letter forces a decision.

The Offer Is a Discount to a Forward Cash Flow Model

Mineral buyers do not price offers off your last royalty check. They price off a discounted cash flow model that runs 10, 20, sometimes 30 years forward. The inputs are straightforward: current production, decline curves from analog wells in the same formation, forward price decks for oil and gas, expected future drilling on the tract, and a discount rate that reflects the buyer’s cost of capital and target return.

Here is the mechanic that matters. The buyer builds a forward value number. Then they offer a fraction of it. The spread between the offer and the modeled value is the buyer’s margin — the return they need to justify the acquisition, plus a cushion for the risk that their model is wrong. That spread is not hidden. It is the entire business model of a mineral acquisition firm.

None of this means the offer is unfair. Buyers take real risk — prices fall, wells underperform, operators go bankrupt, drilling plans slip. What it means is that the offer number tells you almost nothing about what your minerals are worth. It tells you what the buyer needs to pay to hit their return target. Those are two different numbers, and the gap between them is where mineral owners either capture value or leave it on the table. For a deeper look at how to evaluate whether a specific offer is fair, read Got an Offer to Buy Your Mineral Rights? How to Tell If It’s Actually Fair.

Offset Activity Is Often the Biggest Piece of the Model

The single largest driver of upside in most mineral valuations is not what is producing today. It is what is going to be drilled tomorrow. Buyers know this. They map every permit filed within a defined radius of your tract, track rig locations, and cross-reference operator development plans disclosed in investor presentations. If a major is running a multi-rig program in your county and has permits stacked up on adjacent sections, that is a signal — and the buyer has priced it in.

Mineral owners rarely have this view. Most only see the wells currently producing on their interest. They do not see the permits filed last month two sections over, the new lateral geometries being tested in the same bench, or the offset operator’s completion designs that suggest heavier proppant loads and better recoveries. That information is public, but it takes work to compile. For a plain-language guide to reading permit activity and offset drilling near your acreage, read How to Read Oil and Gas Activity on Your Acreage.

The practical implication: an offer that looks generous relative to your last twelve months of royalty income can still be well below fair value if a wave of new development is coming. An offer that looks stingy against a peak production year can be reasonable if wells are deep into decline with no new drilling in sight. Context is everything, and context comes from the same public data the buyer is already using. Working with a team of CPAs, CPLs, and Certified Mineral Managers is one way to compress that information gap quickly.

What You Need in Front of You Before You Respond

You do not have to match the buyer’s model line for line. You need to close enough of the information gap that you can make an informed decision instead of a reactive one. That means assembling five things before you respond to anything:

Production history by well. Monthly volumes for every well tied to your interest, at least the last 24 months, ideally the last 60. Texas RRC and Oklahoma OCC both have this publicly available.

Current lease terms. Royalty rate, primary term status, any post-production deduction language, Pugh clauses, and depth severances. If you have not reviewed your lease recently, here is what the key clauses actually mean.

Offset permit and drilling activity. Every permit within a defined radius, filed in the last 12 to 24 months, with operator and target formation. This is the single most important input the buyer has that most owners lack.

Operator quality signal. Is the operator on your lease a well-capitalized, active driller, or a legacy holder unlikely to develop further? The answer changes the forward value picture significantly.

A cash flow view. Even a rough one — what current wells are likely to pay over the next 5 to 10 years at reasonable price assumptions. Valor’s royalty management team can run this for you quickly using the same public data the buyer is already working from.

With those five pieces in hand, the offer letter becomes what it should have been all along: a data point, not a deadline. You can compare it to a defensible internal number, push back on price, carve out depths or reserve a portion of the interest, or walk away. In the past 36 months, Valor has recovered $32 million for mineral owners — much of it by helping owners see what buyers, operators, and prior managers had already priced in and not shared.

When Selling Is the Right Answer — and When It Is Not

None of this is an argument against selling minerals. There are good reasons to sell: estate simplification, portfolio diversification, tax planning, a life event that makes lumpy royalty income impractical, or a genuinely strong offer at a cyclical price peak. Selling can be the right decision. Selling blind is almost never the right decision.

The mineral owners who transact well share a few habits. They understand what they own before an offer arrives, not after. They keep current title, lease, and division order records. They monitor offset activity in their county on a rolling basis. And they treat unsolicited offers as the beginning of a conversation, not the terms of one. Across the roughly 500,000 wells and $650 million in annual client revenue Valor manages, the owners who consistently protect value treat their minerals as an actively managed asset, not a mailbox check.

If you are weighing a sale and want to understand what your options actually are, read Before You Sell or Lease for the full framework.


Contact Valor Today

If an offer just landed and you do not yet have the picture the buyer has, that gap is closable. Contact Valor today for a free, no-obligation review — our mineral management team will verify what you own, pull your production history, map permit and drilling activity near your tract, and flag what the offer is not telling you before you respond. We handle mineral rights evaluations and offer reviews for owners across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Valor | Energy Connection – July 27, 2026

July 27, 2026 Edition

At Valor, our goal is to keep you informed of the latest news and updates from the oil and gas industry. We are committed to sharing the insights and knowledge that our team gathers to help you stay ahead in this dynamic sector. From mergers and acquisitions to regulatory changes and technological advancements, we cover all the key developments that impact the industry. Stay tuned for weekly updates to keep you well-informed.


  • Expand Energy to acquire Twin Eagle in $1.25 billion natural gas marketing deal
  • Summary: Expand Energy agreed to acquire natural gas marketer Twin Eagle Holdings for $1.25 billion in a transaction expected to close in the third quarter of 2026. Twin Eagle markets over 5 Bcf per day of natural gas and manages 44 Bcf of storage capacity alongside 2 Bcf per day of firm transportation. Upon closing, the combined entity expects to market about 14 Bcf per day of natural gas, while generating $200 million in initial annual EBITDA and $150 million in annual synergies by the end of 2028.
  • Read more

    Oil market’s glut narrative just blew up
  • Summary: Brent crude topped $100 per barrel as supply disruptions struck multiple global chokepoints simultaneously, tightening markets. Concurrent strikes suspended 1.7 million barrels daily in Kazakh flows at Novorossiysk, while Strait of Hormuz flows fell from 20 million barrels daily. Global crude demand dropped nearly 5% in Q2, with European diesel consumption down 5.7% in May and China’s diesel and gasoline demand falling 10% and 5% respectively.
  • Read more
  • Matador Resources acquires Paloma Permian, Ridge Runner in Delaware
  • Summary: Matador Resources agreed to acquire Delaware Basin assets from Paloma Permian and Ridge Runner Resources, expanding its total position to approximately 240,000 net acres. A subsidiary will buy Paloma Permian for $1.275 billion, acquiring 16,235 net undeveloped acres in Eddy and Lea counties, 156 net locations, and estimated third-quarter production of 10,600 to 11,600 boed (57 percent oil). The Ridge Runner deal adds at least 150 net operated locations in the Woodford play of west Texas and southeast New Mexico.
  • Read more
  • U.S. oil drillers take a break as oil prices hover near $100
  • Summary: The total number of active U.S. drilling rigs fell to 587, as oil rigs decreased by 2 to 450, gas rigs rose by 1 to 127, and miscellaneous rigs held at 10. Weekly U.S. crude oil production averaged 13.798 million bpd for the week ending July 17, down from 13.861 million bpd the prior week but up 525,000 bpd year-over-year. Frac spread crews fell by 4 to 196, while Permian Basin rigs dropped by 1 to 258 as Brent crude traded down to $95.96 (-4.70%) and WTI dropped to $88.30 (-4.22%).
  • Read more
  • Energy Transfer, Sunoco, two others announce move to Texas
  • Summary: Four oil and gas companies, including Energy Transfer, Sunoco LP, SunocoCorp LLC, and USA Compression Partners, jointly announced their move from Delaware to Texas. The redomiciliations took effect on July 6, becoming effective on July 13 for market purposes, with all four companies now based in Dallas. Energy Transfer operates 140,000 miles of pipelines across 44 states, while Sunoco operates 14,000 miles of pipelines and at least 160 terminals as USA Compression Partners serves as a gas provider.
  • Read more

    Oil near $100 puts Fed and peers in interest-rate spotlight
  • Summary: Central bankers across the Group of Seven are evaluating potential interest rate responses as crude oil approaches $100 per barrel, threatening to reignite energy-driven inflation. Ahead of the Federal Reserve’s July 29 decision, U.S. gross domestic product is projected to show an annualized 2.1% expansion in the second quarter. Globally, euro-zone inflation picked up to 2.9% in July, South Korean exports surged over 50% year-on-year in early July, and Colombia faces a 12.5% rate consensus.
  • Read more

    EQT misses quarterly profit estimates on weak gas prices, raises production forecast
  • Summary: EQT posted an adjusted second-quarter profit of 39 cents per share, missing estimates of 40 cents as natural gas futures dropped 17.5% to $3.020 per mmBtu. Despite its realized price dropping to $2.65 per thousand cubic feet equivalent, the company’s total sales volume rose 11% to 634 bcfe while capital expenditures grew 20.2% to $666 million. EQT raised its full-year 2026 production forecast to between 2.38 tcfe and 2.45 tcfe and expects third-quarter total sales volume of 570 bcfe to 620 bcfe.
  • Read more


Contact Valor Today

Contact us today if you need help outsourcing your oil and gas operations.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. The blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Why Is My Royalty Check So Small? Post-Production Deductions, Explained

You open the envelope, and the number is smaller than last month — even though the well is still producing and prices have not collapsed. In the past 36 months, Valor has recovered more than $32 million for mineral owners in exactly this situation: checks that looked wrong, and were. Post-production deductions are the single most common reason a royalty check underdelivers, and they are also the most misunderstood line item on the statement. This post covers what those deductions are, why they hit hardest in low-price months, how your lease decides whether they are allowed, and what to do before you call the operator.

What Post-Production Deductions Actually Are

Post-production costs are the expenses an operator incurs to move raw hydrocarbons from the wellhead to a marketable point of sale. The five categories you will see most often on a check stub are:

  • 1. Gathering — moving gas through low-pressure pipe from the wellhead to a central point
  • 2. Compression — boosting pressure so gas can enter a larger pipeline
  • 3. Treating and dehydration — removing water, CO2, and H2S
  • 4. Processing — stripping out natural gas liquids like ethane, propane, and butane at a plant
  • 5. Transportation — long-haul pipeline tariffs to the sales point

Each of these has a real cost, and someone has to pay it. The question your lease answers — or fails to answer clearly — is whether the operator pays the full cost out of its working interest, or whether it can charge a proportionate share back against your royalty. When deductions are permitted, they scale with your royalty fraction, so every dollar of gathering, compression, and processing booked against the well flows through in proportion to your interest.

The result: two royalty owners on adjacent tracts, producing from the same formation, at the same wellhead price, can receive materially different net checks depending on how their leases were negotiated 10, 30, or 60 years ago.

Why the Math Gets Ugly When Prices Drop

Most gathering, compression, and processing fees are structured as a flat rate per unit of volume — a fixed number of cents or dollars per Mcf. Those fees do not scale with the commodity price. They are the same when gas is trading high as when it is trading low.

The consequence is that the deduction stack takes up a much larger share of gross value in weak-price months. When the sales price falls, the flat fees do not. What used to be a tolerable percentage of the gross becomes a much larger percentage of a much smaller number, and the net royalty compresses hard. That is why owners in dry-gas plays across the country routinely report that a check looks fine one quarter and shockingly thin the next, even when volumes are steady.

Liquids-rich gas is a partial hedge — NGL revenue can offset processing fees — but only if the operator is remitting your proportionate share of NGL proceeds correctly, and only if the plant economics work in your favor that month. Frequently one or both of those conditions is not met, and the owner has no way to see it without reconciling the statement line by line.

“At the Wellhead” vs. “Gross Proceeds” — The Language That Decides Everything

Nearly every dispute over post-production deductions turns on a single clause in the oil and gas lease: where royalty is calculated and what value it is calculated against.

Leases that say royalty is paid on the value at the wellhead generally permit the operator to deduct post-production costs before calculating your share. The logic: if royalty is owed at the wellhead, then any cost incurred downstream of the wellhead to enhance value can be netted back out. Texas courts have generally supported this reading, and the state’s default rule — absent explicit lease language to the contrary — is that post-production costs are shared.

Leases that say royalty is paid on gross proceeds, the amount realized, or the market value at the point of sale — with no wellhead qualifier and often with an express prohibition on deductions — generally do not permit the operator to charge post-production costs back to the royalty owner. Oklahoma has historically been friendlier to the gross-proceeds interpretation than Texas, but the specific language of your lease still controls, and case law continues to evolve in both states.

The practical takeaway: pull your lease, find the royalty clause, and read the exact words. If it says “at the well” or “at the wellhead,” deductions are likely permitted. If it says “gross proceeds received by lessee” or contains an express no-deductions clause, deductions on your check may be improper. This is the single most valuable 15 minutes a mineral owner can spend. For a full breakdown of how to negotiate cost-free royalty language before you sign, read How to Negotiate an Oil and Gas Lease.

How to Actually Read the Statement

Operator check stubs are not standardized. One operator will list deductions as GATH, COMP, TRANS, PROC, DEHY. Another will bundle everything into a single “Deducts” column with no breakdown. A third will show a gross value and a net value with the delta unlabeled. All three are common, and all three are generally legal under state royalty statutes as long as the owner can request detail. If you have never read a check stub line by line, our royalty check stub guide walks through every field.

Here is what to reconcile every month, or at minimum every quarter:

Volumes. Compare the Mcf and BBL on your check to the state regulator’s production reporting — Texas Railroad Commission or Oklahoma Corporation Commission filings. They should match, allowing for a reporting lag.

Price. Compare the price per unit on your check to the posted price or index for that basin and month. A significant discount often signals either legitimate quality and location differentials or an issue worth questioning.

Decimal interest. Confirm the decimal on your check matches the decimal on your division order. Ownership changes, unit revisions, and pooling amendments all shift decimals, and errors are common. If you have not received a division order and believe you should have, here is what to do.

Deduction codes. Ask the operator in writing for a description of every code. You are entitled to know what you are being charged for.

Severance and ad valorem tax. These are separate from post-production deductions. Confirm they match state rates.

If the operator refuses to provide a code key or a breakdown, most state statutes give royalty owners the right to request detailed accounting. In Texas, that request should be in writing and reference the statutory right to information. Persistent refusal is itself a red flag.

When to Push Back — and How

Not every small check is a bad check. Sometimes prices are simply low, a well is in natural decline, or an operator has legitimately incurred higher processing costs because of a plant outage. Pushing back on every downtick will burn goodwill without recovering a dollar.

Push back when the evidence supports it:

  • Your lease contains a gross-proceeds or no-deductions clause and deductions are appearing on the check
  • Your decimal interest is wrong
  • Volumes on the check do not match state filings
  • The operator has changed its deduction methodology mid-lease without notice
  • You are seeing charges — marketing fees, affiliate transportation fees, unspecified “other” — that do not fit a recognized category

The right sequence is almost always: request a written breakdown of all deduction codes and calculations, compare against your lease language and state production filings, send a formal demand letter identifying the specific charges you dispute and citing the lease clause, and if unresolved escalate to counsel or a professional mineral manager who can pursue audit rights or statutory remedies.

Across the 500,000 wells we cover, the most productive recoveries come from owners who catch the issue early and negotiate from specific evidence rather than general frustration. If your check stopped entirely rather than just running small, read Why Your Royalty Check Suddenly Stopped for the full breakdown on recoupment and shut-ins.

Small royalty checks are sometimes just the market. Sometimes they are a lease-language problem, a decimal error, or an improper deduction that will keep compounding until someone catches it.


Contact Valor Today

If your royalty checks are running smaller than they should and the operator’s math does not add up, a second set of eyes on your statements and lease language is the fastest way to find out why. Contact Valor today for a free, no-obligation review — our royalty management team will audit your check stubs, verify your decimal interest, compare your deductions against your lease language, and flag anything that should not be there. We handle royalty audits and statement reviews for owners across Oklahoma, Texas, and 30 other states.

The information provided by Valor in this blog is for general informational purposes only, not to provide specific recommendations or legal or tax-related advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.